Worker and former workers of the public company Inecodependent on the Ministry of Transport, show their discomfort after knowing that Jésica Rodríguez, former lover and Escort of José Luis Ábaloshe charged the state without working. They highlight the long history of this public company to try not to pay a penny of more. Sometimes, Justice has stopped his feet.
For example, Manuel reveals in an exclusive interview with OKDIARIO How he managed to win a legal battle of 11,000 euros Against the company after being fired inadmissively, as a sentence collects. The company tried to avoid its labor responsibilities through a TEMPORARY CONTRACT CONCATENATION which were finally declared in law fraud by the courts. It is not a unique case, other sentences consulted reflect this labor conflict. The discomfort in the Ineco template and its union representatives is total.
«I worked great, but in the end They wanted to play her by stealing money. As I did not let myself play, I demanded them, ”explains the former employee, an engineer who worked in the construction sector. «They made dozens of contracts, that everyone does. I was used to having millions of contracts. Privately understood, but in the public you expect that it is not, ”he adds.
The case, which reached the Supreme Court, which neither came to admit the company’s appeal after two judicial victories of Manuel. The High Court condemned the payment of the coasts to the transport company for resorting without any viso to win the lawsuit.
Previously, the Superior Court of Justice of Galicia (TSJG), revealed those questionable work practices within a public company. The sentence of March 2022 – when Jésica charged without working as an ineco and, according to an email, He charged to accompany Ábalos to Travel– confirms that Ineco chained at least Six temporary contracts to the worker from 2018 to 2021, all of them without real justification of temporality.
«We were the last two or three months working seven days a week For two weeks, 12 hours a day. Therefore, we generated many vacations, ”explains the engineer. The conflict arose when, after finishing its last contract, the company He liquidated 20 days of accumulated vacations But counting calendar days instead of working. «They wanted to steal eight or ten days. Then I told them that I was not satisfied, ”he recalls.
Ineco judgment
According to the TSJG judgment, the worker was initially hired on May 8, 2018 under the modality of «eventual due to production circumstances“, Alleging an” accumulation of tasks motivated in the Infrastructure Management to provide technical support in the stabilization and repair of slopes. “
However, during all the time he was linked to Ineco, his real functions were those of «Head of circulation and supervisor of deviations, First in one section and then in another, in the north of the country, in addition to performing road inspection functions, ”according to the proven facts.
After this first contract, three more eventual contracts, an interim contract were followed and, finally, one by a specific work or service. «Everyone with generic and inaccurate causes“As the court valued, which considered that there was” an essential unit of the link “and declared that its relationship should be considered indefinite from the beginning.
The former employee tells this newspaper that, after consulting with a friend who is a judge precisely from the social, decided to stand up to the company: «I told them that, or they paid me the days they owed me, or I went to trial. They answered that if I went to the court they would not hire me in life. Indeed, then they hired people and me.
«I went to trial. They lost, claimed in the second instance and the supreme, and They did not go to the Constitutional and the Hague of Milagro. They lost everything, ”explains the worker with satisfaction. The court declared the inadmissible dismissal and forced Ineco to readmit it or compensate considering its real age since 2018.
Generalized practices
The case goes beyond a simple individual claim. The engineer denounces that these practices are common in public companies as an ineco or tragsa, which they exercise «unfair competition»With private companies. «Even if it is one Public Company that They are supposed to be honest, In the end they are less honest than private ones, ”he says.
«There is an association of companies that are dedicated to writing projects, which has sued ineco several times Because they give him Simply The works and triple prices that would give it to a private company that competes, ”denounces the former worker.
This case exemplifies a problem that affects many Spanish public sectors. The TSJG ruling is overwhelming in stating that “all the temporary contracts signed were In law fraud», Highlighting that the cause alleged in the contracts was« absolutely imprecise and generic ».
The story of this worker, which It is politically “left” Although he strongly criticizes Spanish progressive parties, shows the drama of the temporality In public employment, a problem that labor reforms have tried to stop with unequal results.
«In the end, they recognized me as if it were A discontinuous fixed because they had made illegal contracts, ”concludes the worker, who recommends others in his situation that do not hesitate to go to court Although companies threaten with reprisals: «I told them that it seemed very good to me, that I did not want to work with unpresentable companies. I also told them so.
