The Bayern bosses contradict the honorary president in terms of fixed deposits and the Müller-Aus. FC Bayern is the loser, which does not succeed in communication.
Toni Kroos could not help but a side blow a week ago. “Too many chefs spoil the porridge,” the ex-professional wrote on the platform X (formerly before Twitter) and should only see more confirmed since Saturday.
Finally he tries FC Bayern Currently in two much -discussed topics to gain the sovereignty of interpretation: it is about the fixed -term deposit account and that of Thomas Müller.
Discussions about the fixed deposit account
Only: Those responsible, in the form of sports director Max Eberl, CEO Jan-Christian Dreesen and Honorary President Uli Hoeneß, have contradicted several times in the past eight days alone-and raise the question of who is now responsible for which decision and which makes it which statements.
After all, both decisions are related: the fixed deposit account, once the big trump card of the record champions, has been significantly melted in recent years. There are different views about how much is still there. Uli Hoeneß said in an interview with the “Welt am Sonntag”: “FC Bayern has to save clearly. There is not much more from our time deposit account. We have to rethink economically.”
This statement countered CEO Dreesen on Saturday at Sky: “There is enough on it – for whom it may always be enough.” These statements were related to a possible transfer from the size of a Florian Wirtzwho, according to Hoeneß, is “not an issue at the moment”.
FC Bayern’s finances are not only relevant in transfer questions, but also in the course of the Müller-Aus’. Last week Max Eberl said in the “Doppelpass”: “There is nothing to do with it, you have to honestly say that. And it is not the all the decisive factors either.”
Rather, it was about the squad planning, with a possible Wirtz transfer, Müller would only be the third choice on the ten. Hoeneß confirmed the aspect of the squad planning, but contradicted the financial question: “If the economic situation of FC Bayern was still as before, we say three years, the decision in the case might might have been different.”
What are the real reasons for Müller-Aus?
Dreesen reacted on this on Saturday: “It was a sporting decision by Max Eberl and Christoph Freund Together with the trainer. ” Eberl added after the final whistle in the Allianz Arena: “It was a sporting decision. Purely sporty.” And: “I know football differently than that income and expenses have to fit. I honestly have to say how big the time deposit account is.”
Even if the squad planning is logically based on sporting decisions, Eberl contradicted his own statement from the “double pass” – and just Hoeneß. Dreesen, on the other hand, became more specific and explained that there were discussions “once with the coach and once without the coach” before the Müller decision.
He involuntarily fell into Vincent Kompany, who has so far played down his responsibility. “My role is that the players are prepared for the next game. With all the others, it remains an association where you always exchanged more seriously about everything.”
