Someone will have to explain the swings of the Prosecutor’s Real Madrid Vinicius Jr It is not serious enough to constitute a crime of this nature, the Public Ministry will have to explain why it is hitting a monigote with the face of the president of the GovernmentFor example. The Prosecutor’s Office has asked to file the cause open to two Barça fans in a October 2023 at the Montjuic Stadiumby ruling out that they are serious enough to constitute a crime of hate. And justifies it with the argument that they have not been able to clarify what were the expressions issued by the investigated.
Of course, the curl curls by ensuring that even if they were offensive, they do not constitute a crime of hatred incitement since they did not cause “effect called” between the public or the suspension of the party. That is, if they had called him “monkey,” as the insult was not replaced by the stadium or caused the suspension of the meeting, there is no crime of hate.
It seems that for the Public Ministry the crime of hate is measured to weight: if they insult a few there is no conviction, if the insult extends it becomes criminal. There is no one who understands it. In his statement as injured, the footballer said he had felt offended because they had shouted “mono” and “foolish fool,” but the prosecutor argues that “there is not even certainty” of what expressions they gave themselves against the footballer: “Fucking monkey” According to a labiofacial reading report provided by the League, “Fool” According to Vinicius and “Much Morro” According to the investigated. With decisions, the Prosecutor’s Office sows the land so that the next time someone is denounced for calling Vinicius or any other player the defendant is defended with the argument that I do not call him “monkey” but “morro” and that, in any case, if he called “monkey” he did not commit crime because the meeting was not suspended. Delirious.
