The Audience of Granada has condemned Six months in prison and more than one thousand euros of fine To a man who sE presented by another person to the theoretical examination for the recovery of driving license pointsfor which he manipulated the DNI of the man whom he intended to help in order to prevent him from being caught.
The defendant appeared to the exam in the offices of the Provincial Traffic Headquarters of Granada, on the Alfacar road with the other person’s ID, but on the original photograph he superimposed a transparent adhesive sheet with a photograph of him.
Using this document in which his image appeared but with the identity data of the other person, who had really lost the points of the card, the defendant managed to access the room where the test was developed and that the exam leaf was given to him with the questions he should answer.
However, they did not fill in the exam as it was removed by the agents of the Civil Traffic Guard who checked the identity documentation provided by those who examined that day and that they verified that the defendant was being presented by another person, as stated in the sentence, to which Europa Press has had access.
The individual who could benefit this deception was initially investigated, but Criminal Court number 5, who was in charge of prosecuting the matter, acquitted him when he considered that his participation in the facts was not accredited. On the contrary, the man who appeared at the exam was convicted as the author of a Crime of falsehood in official document After recognizing the facts.
The Criminal Court sentenced to nine months in prison already 3,240 euros of a fine, although the defendant appealed before the Provincial Court claiming that he did not commit the crime because he could not deliver the exam. The Court rejects this extreme warning that the falsehood in official document occurred at the same time that the manipulated ID exhibited with the claim of being able to access the evidence.
Yes, the Provincial Court has estimated its appeal that in this case it corresponds to apply the minimum penalty, so the prison penalty and the fine of 3,240 euros initially imposed on 1,080 euros have reduced from nine to six months, all in a sentence against which it fits appeal before the supreme.
