Cándido Conde-PumpidoPresident of Constitutional Courthas requested a report from the lawyers of the Court of Guarantees with the will to block that the Court of Justice of the European Union pronounce on the pardon of the TC to the former socialist presidents of the Junta de Andalucía, Manuel Chaves and José Antonio Griñánconvicted of embezzling 680 million euros in the case of the ERE of Andalusia.
The president of the TC wants to study whether the Seville audience can raise a preliminary ruling to Tjuein relation to the ERE case, after the Seville hearing has questioned that the amparo granted by the Constitutional to the convicted Manuel Chaves and José Antonio Griñánbe completely “compatible” with the right of the European Union, and has asked the parties on whether the Court of Guarantees was “extracted” and “invaded” areas reserved for the judges.
Count-Pump has consulted the magistrates of the First Chamber on whether an ordinary court can go to Tjue to try to dodge the resolutions of the Constitutional Court that presides. Before, he had told them about a case of the Superior Court of Justice in Madrid but immediately introduced the case of the ERE of Andalusia. The matter is expected to be discussed in the plenary this Tuesday.
In parallel, Cándido Conde-Pumpido He has commissioned a report to the lawyers of the Court of Guarantees, questioning the viability of Spanish judges being accredited to raise a preliminary ruling for resolutions of the Constitutional, according to the information advanced by the newspaper The Spanish.
Spanish judges and magistrates have competencies to ask Court of Justice of the European Unionalthough the doubt remains in whether they can do so regarding sentences and resolutions of the Court of Guarantees, a loophole that uses pumpido to try to block that the TJUE pronounced on the pardon to the condemned socialist presidents. In a recent providence of which the EFE agencythe Seville audience It raises doubts about the compatibility with the right of the European Union of the Constitutional Resolution, which annulled the penalty of prison to Griñán and reduced the penalty of Manuel Chaves.
In the aforementioned providence, the opinion of the parties is requested on whether the Constitutional Court has been “overreach” In the corresponding control function, “invading areas reserved for the jurisdiction of judges and courts” when checking so much by the own Seville audience as for him Supreme Court.
