Home Top News Criticism of JK Rowling for celebrating the decision of the British Supreme

Criticism of JK Rowling for celebrating the decision of the British Supreme

100
0

British writer JK Rowling celebrated on Wednesday the ruling of the British Supreme Court that states that The terms “woman” and “sex” in equality legislation refer to biological sexsomething she defended.

“Three extraordinary and tenacious Scottish women, with an army behind, They got this case to reach the Supreme And, when winning, they have protected the rights of women and girls throughout the United Kingdom, “wrote the author of Harry Potter In the social network X (formerly Twitter).

“Forwomenscot, I am very proud to meet you,” he added, alluding to for for Women Scotland, The organization that demanded the Scottish government for considering trans people as women in its public policies for the protection of female sex.

The day after the decision, the writer published a photograph in the aforementioned social network where he comes out and with a glass in his hand. “I love when a plan runs successfully”, He added to the image on the occasion of celebration.

This publication has more than 45,000 visualizations and has caused a wave of criticism On the part of users around the world, who have reacted without tapujos about it.


“I find it very difficult to understand how a person enjoys spreading people who do not know”, “is a loser”, “with how easy it is to let others what they are,” “She hates trans people. Women do not care” Or “Remember this: even in your worst moment, you will never be as miserable as JK Rowling,” are some of the comments.

JK Rowling, resident in Scotland, has been a central figure in the debate on gender identityand contributed 70,000 pounds (81,728 euros) in 2024 for the judicial appeal of this feminist organization.

The writer has been accused of transphobia for their opinions and has starred public confrontations with actors from the film saga of Harry Pottersuch as Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson, who have different opinions on the matter.

Source link