The judge has agreed to the precautionary measure of return their parents to the newborn whose custody was withdrawn Due to the reports of the social services of the Junta de Castilla-La Mancha, which received a risk for the baby and must continue with a weekly follow-up because “there is still a risk,” according to the resolution. The parents’ lawyer, Julián Sánchez Rojas, explained that they are “Very satisfied” and “very happy” with the precautionary measure taken by the court.
The baby was born in early December 2024 and the Provincial Social Welfare Delegation of the Communities Board in Toledo He withdrew custody to his parents a few days later After the reports of the technical services that showed a risk to the baby, something that the parents denounced in the courts.
The lawyer explained that the judge has taken the measure after two views, held on March 20 and 26, and the tests and conclusions practiced. Thus, he added that now the Court of First Instance and Instruction number 1 of Toledo You will have to dictate the final resolution. Sanchez has indicated that “the urgency” that the parents had was to adopt the precautionary measure to deliver to the baby and once this decision has been taken, “a more ordinary procedure in which the judge, in view of the evidence, will determine to point out a view.”
The Minister of Social Welfare, Bárbara García Torijano, has said, to questions from the journalists, that the judge’s resolution needs that there must be a weekly monitoring with the family despite the fact that the girl has returned home since “there is still a risk”, as social welfare technicians have already perceived when they made the decision to withdraw custody.
Has stressed thatAnd the decision made by the technicians was “well accurate”, According to the judge’s report, and it was not definitive but provisional, and has indicated that “it is always desirable for children to return to their home, with their relatives.”
Along these lines, the spokeswoman for the Government of Castilla-La Mancha, Esther Padilla, has assured that the regional executive “Respect” the judge’s decision, which has taken “once he has known all the file information.” In addition, he has stressed that, in his brief, he refers to the need to make a “weekly monitoring” by social services.
“We are glad that, if the circumstances have changed, he could return with his parents,” said Padilla, who stressed that “No one doubts that the Ministry of Social Welfare and Municipal Social Services ensure the interests of the minor” and that they do it “scrupulous”, with “dedication” and with “good faith” because there have been “potential risks.”
He has affirmed that the work of the technicians is “to ensure the best interests of the child” and that the judge also recognizes it in his letter, in which he adds “with good judgment” that “The only thing that has been intended is to protect the newborn from future risks,” The spokesman has said.
Among the reasons for the withdrawal of custody that argued social welfare are that the baby’s mother has been admitted to 18 years in different reception centers due to ill -treatment by their parents; the lack of Marental skills; The absence of a support for the care of the girl, and housing and economic instability.
