On Friday, March 28, the lawyer Bárbara Royo He gave a good review of the socialist politician José Cepeda in Everything is a lie. In the program of Cuatro, the decision of the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia was discussed to revoke the sentence of four and a half years in prison to the former footballer Dani Alves For sexual assault. While Cepeda supported the reform of the Criminal Code after the Law is only yes the lawyer put her in place with strong arguments: «It is a deception that reform of the Criminal Code because it has not reformed absolutely anything and what it has done has been to take thousands, sorry, hundreds of aggressors to the street. So don’t talk about that of the Law is only yes Because far from fixing anything what he has done is harm him. Because yes, it is precisely a lawyer who has to qualify whether a law is a deception or not, not a journalist or a politician. And above all not a politician of those now who have no fashioned idea of criminal policy ».
The Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) has revoked the sentence of four and a half years in prison to Dani Alves, former soccer player of Barcelona, for sexual assault. The Brazilian, who has been in provisional freedom for a year, became several months in prison for the alleged sexual assault to a young woman at the Sutton disco in Barcelona in 2022, which is now acquitted.
Dani Alves, at his exit from jail. (EP)This was one of the central themes of the program Everything is a lie last Friday, March 28, which created a strong discussion between lawyer Bárbara Royo and the socialist politician José Cepeda
At a certain moment of the debate, Cepeda (who was on the set) complained that the lawyer (who spoke from a live connection) had said that “the laws are deceiving” and that that was not typical of a jurist.
José Cepeda.Royo responded bluntly: «I have not said that the laws are deceived, I have said that the reform of the Criminal Code is a bodrium criticized by all jurists and by all judges and associations of judges, lawyers and jurists. Obviously, this reform of the Criminal Code is a deception because it has not reformed absolutely anything and what it has done has been to take thousands, sorry, hundreds of aggressors to the street ».
The lawyer continued to claim that: «So do not talk to me about that of the Law is only yes Because far from fixing anything what he has done is harm him. Because yes, it is precisely a lawyer who has to qualify whether a law is a deception or not, not a journalist or a politician. And above all not a politician now who do not have a bit of criminal policy on the time of going out with the banners. Because of course, with Dani Alves, the first ones who went out with the banners were the politicians. The Criminal Code was reformed following the pack but The pack It was convicted with the previous Criminal Code and look at the amount of penalty you have The pack And it was with the previous Criminal Code, so, what are we talking about? It was a penal code that already collected consent ».
Alves, unanimously acquitted
The Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) has revoked the sentence of four and a half years in prison to Dani Alves, former soccer player of Barcelona, for sexual assault. The Brazilian, who has been in provisional freedom for a year, became several months in prison for the alleged sexual assault to a young woman at the Sutton disco in Barcelona in 2022, which is now acquitted.
Dani Alves was sentenced by the Barcelona audience to four and a half years in prison, of which he turned several months after achieving provisional freedom, as well as he was convicted of not approaching the home or job of the victim less than 1,000 meters and communicating with her by any means of 9 years and 6 months.
Dani Alves (EFE).However, now the Appeals Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia revokes that conviction of the Barcelona Hearing and unanimously acquitting Dani Alves of the crime of sexual aggression. That room of the TSJC, composed of three women and a man, now explains that the testimony of the young woman “is not enough” to keep the conviction to Dani Alves and that in this case, which was very media, the right to the presumption of innocence must be preserved.
